Washington — President Obama’s new immigration policies could affect as many as 5 million people, including the possibility of a three-year reprieve from the threat of deportation for parents of children with legal status.
The policies will go into effect this year, potentially creating dramatic changes for those who are in the United States illegally. Also ahead in 2015 is this important shift: agents will focus more on deporting people with lengthy or violent criminal records and less on people whose only violations are immigration offenses.
The new approach will end the dragnet system that enlisted the police in blowing the whistle on immigrants. But the policies won’t apply to most of the 11.2 million living in the country illegally.
Don’t expect Mr. Obama’s plan to roll out without a fight. Republicans in Congress already have promised to try to undo the new policies.
“This is a serious breach of our Constitution. It’s a serious threat to our system of government,” House Speaker John A. Boehner said as the plan was announced. But practically, there is little the Republicans can do.
Republican governors in states affected by the new deportation policies have called out the lawyers. At least 24 states have sued to block the plan, and their cases are expected to play out in the courts throughout the year.
Here’s a look at the plan and what to expect:
Who would benefit?
Mostly immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally and who have children who are citizens (nearly all children born in the United States are automatically citizens) or permanent legal residents. To be eligible, people have to have been living here since Jan. 1, 2010, and have no record of serious crime that would make them a priority for removal.
A White House legal memo said this “would serve an important humanitarian interest in keeping parents together with children who are lawfully present in the United States.” Approved applicants will get permission to stay for three years. As many as 4.1 million people could fit the criteria, the administration estimates. The application will cost $465.
What about people who came to the United States as children?
The program expands the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program begun in 2012 that has protected 587,000 young people from deportation. The new rules eliminate an age limit and open the program to anyone here since 2010, instead of the old cutoff of 2007. An estimated 300,000 more young men and women would be eligible.
Does this mean these people will become legal residents?
No. The administration is using its discretion to not target those people. Absent other changes, such as a law passed by Congress, the people’s residency could revert to illegal status after their temporary reprieves expire.
Where are most of the people from, and where do they live now?
About two-thirds are from Mexico, the source of most immigrants to the United States. The biggest share of the eligible parents, more than 1.1 million, lives in California, with the next biggest populations in Texas and Illinois.
What about the more than 6 million people who don’t qualify?
Some arrived in the United States too recently to qualify, but most are excluded because they didn’t have children born here. According to the Pew Research Center, about 85 percent of people who live in the United States without authorization have been here for five years or more. That’s because immigration has tapered off in recent years, said Jeff Passel, Pew’s senior demographer. The biggest group of people who’ve lived here long enough but don’t qualify is single men, he said. Others are married without children. Some have children who were born elsewhere; for example, parents of children born in Mexico and brought to the United States aren’t eligible.
Is the new program open to parents of children who’ve already received a reprieve under DACA?
No. Administration lawyers decided that was a bridge too far, and without legal basis since there would be no family member with legal status in the country — only children with a temporary relief order. That decision disappointed some immigration activists, who point out that those families could be split up.
If someone met these qualifications — in the United States for five years, with American-born children — but was deported, could they now apply to get back in?
No. Those cases are considered closed by immigration officials. As many as 300,000 people could fit that category, according to Randy Capps, director of research for the nonprofit Migration Policy Institute. However, the new policy says that people who are subject to deportation actions — even those who have received final removal orders but are still in the United States — can apply to stay.
How will enforcement change under the new rules?
The administration says its top priority will be to go after border crossers and people considered dangerous, such as convicted felons and gang members. The second priority is people convicted of three misdemeanor crimes, or who have significant offenses such as domestic violence or drug trafficking.
At the bottom of the list are people who have committed no crimes other than illegally entering the country, particularly if they’ve been in the United States since Jan. 1, 2014. The administration is doing away with the much-derided Secure Communities program, which enlisted the police to hold unauthorized people on detainers for immigration agents. The government will still collect fingerprint data.
Who else could benefit from the changes?
Also in the works are changes to rules for granting visas for science and technology students, and to streamline the clunky and inflexible rules on work visas, to make it easier for people to change jobs without jeopardizing their immigration status.
Providence Journal
